\[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}
\]
↓
\[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}
\]
(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))
↓
(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))
double code(double w, double l) {
return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}
↓
double code(double w, double l) {
return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}
real(8) function code(w, l)
real(8), intent (in) :: w
real(8), intent (in) :: l
code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function
↓
real(8) function code(w, l)
real(8), intent (in) :: w
real(8), intent (in) :: l
code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function
public static double code(double w, double l) {
return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}
↓
public static double code(double w, double l) {
return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}
def code(w, l):
return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))
↓
def code(w, l):
return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))
function code(w, l)
return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end
↓
function code(w, l)
return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end
function tmp = code(w, l)
tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end
↓
function tmp = code(w, l)
tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end
code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}
↓
e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}
Alternatives
| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 99.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 19456 |
|---|
\[\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 98.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 13440 |
|---|
\[e^{-w} \cdot \left(\ell + \ell \cdot \left(w \cdot \log \ell\right)\right)
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 98.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 13440 |
|---|
\[\left(e^{-w} \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(1 + w \cdot \log \ell\right)
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 98.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 13376 |
|---|
\[\frac{\ell + \ell \cdot \left(w \cdot \log \ell\right)}{e^{w}}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 97.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 6660 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;w \leq 330:\\
\;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(1 - w\right) + \left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.5 - w \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;e^{-w}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 97.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 6592 |
|---|
\[\frac{\ell}{e^{w}}
\]
| Alternative 7 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 86.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 1348 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \ell \cdot \left(1 - w\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;w \leq 0.056:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.5 - w \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(1 + t_0\right) + -1\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 8 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 86.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 708 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \ell \cdot \left(1 - w\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;w \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(1 + t_0\right) + -1\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 9 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 78.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 64 |
|---|
\[\ell
\]