?

Average Accuracy: 99.4% → 99.6%
Time: 9.5s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 576

?

\[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(1 \leq a \land a \leq 2\right) \land 2 \leq b\right) \land b \leq 4\right) \land 4 \leq c\right) \land c \leq 8\right) \land 8 \leq d\right) \land d \leq 16\right) \land 16 \leq e\right) \land e \leq 32\]
\[\left(\left(\left(e + d\right) + c\right) + b\right) + a \]
\[e + \left(c + \left(d + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right) \]
(FPCore (a b c d e) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ e d) c) b) a))
(FPCore (a b c d e) :precision binary64 (+ e (+ c (+ d (+ b a)))))
double code(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e) {
	return (((e + d) + c) + b) + a;
}
double code(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e) {
	return e + (c + (d + (b + a)));
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c, d, e)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    real(8), intent (in) :: e
    code = (((e + d) + c) + b) + a
end function
real(8) function code(a, b, c, d, e)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    real(8), intent (in) :: e
    code = e + (c + (d + (b + a)))
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e) {
	return (((e + d) + c) + b) + a;
}
public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e) {
	return e + (c + (d + (b + a)));
}
def code(a, b, c, d, e):
	return (((e + d) + c) + b) + a
def code(a, b, c, d, e):
	return e + (c + (d + (b + a)))
function code(a, b, c, d, e)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(e + d) + c) + b) + a)
end
function code(a, b, c, d, e)
	return Float64(e + Float64(c + Float64(d + Float64(b + a))))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c, d, e)
	tmp = (((e + d) + c) + b) + a;
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c, d, e)
	tmp = e + (c + (d + (b + a)));
end
code[a_, b_, c_, d_, e_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(e + d), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision] + b), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision]
code[a_, b_, c_, d_, e_] := N[(e + N[(c + N[(d + N[(b + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\left(\left(\left(e + d\right) + c\right) + b\right) + a
e + \left(c + \left(d + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right)

Error?

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Target

Original99.4%
Target99.6%
Herbie99.6%
\[\left(d + \left(c + \left(a + b\right)\right)\right) + e \]

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 99.4%

    \[\left(\left(\left(e + d\right) + c\right) + b\right) + a \]
  2. Simplified99.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e + \left(c + \left(d + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
    Proof

    [Start]99.4

    \[ \left(\left(\left(e + d\right) + c\right) + b\right) + a \]

    associate-+l+ [=>]99.5

    \[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(e + d\right) + c\right) + \left(b + a\right)} \]

    associate-+l+ [=>]99.5

    \[ \color{blue}{\left(e + \left(d + c\right)\right)} + \left(b + a\right) \]

    associate-+l+ [=>]99.6

    \[ \color{blue}{e + \left(\left(d + c\right) + \left(b + a\right)\right)} \]

    +-commutative [=>]99.6

    \[ e + \left(\color{blue}{\left(c + d\right)} + \left(b + a\right)\right) \]

    associate-+l+ [=>]99.6

    \[ e + \color{blue}{\left(c + \left(d + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto e + \left(c + \left(d + \left(b + a\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy99.6%
Cost576
\[e + \left(a + \left(c + \left(d + b\right)\right)\right) \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy25.7%
Cost448
\[b + \left(d + \left(e + c\right)\right) \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy23.2%
Cost320
\[c + \left(e + d\right) \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy21.2%
Cost192
\[e + d \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy18.9%
Cost64
\[e \]

Error

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023129 
(FPCore (a b c d e)
  :name "Expression 1, p15"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (and (and (and (and (and (and (and (<= 1.0 a) (<= a 2.0)) (<= 2.0 b)) (<= b 4.0)) (<= 4.0 c)) (<= c 8.0)) (<= 8.0 d)) (<= d 16.0)) (<= 16.0 e)) (<= e 32.0))

  :herbie-target
  (+ (+ d (+ c (+ a b))) e)

  (+ (+ (+ (+ e d) c) b) a))