?

Average Accuracy: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 3.0s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 6720

?

\[0 \leq x \land x \leq 2\]
\[x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot x \]
\[x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, x\right) \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (* x x)) (* x x)))
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (* x (fma x x x)))
double code(double x) {
	return (x * (x * x)) + (x * x);
}
double code(double x) {
	return x * fma(x, x, x);
}
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(x * x)) + Float64(x * x))
end
function code(x)
	return Float64(x * fma(x, x, x))
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(x * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
code[x_] := N[(x * N[(x * x + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot x
x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, x\right)

Error?

Target

Original100.0%
Target100.0%
Herbie100.0%
\[\left(\left(1 + x\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot x \]

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot x \]
  2. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, x\right)} \]
    Proof

    [Start]100.0

    \[ x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot x \]

    distribute-lft-out [=>]100.0

    \[ \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x \cdot x + x\right)} \]

    fma-def [=>]100.0

    \[ x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, x\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, x\right) \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy100.0%
Cost576
\[x \cdot x + x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy100.0%
Cost448
\[\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy97.8%
Cost192
\[x \cdot x \]

Error

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023129 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Expression 3, p15"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (<= 0.0 x) (<= x 2.0))

  :herbie-target
  (* (* (+ 1.0 x) x) x)

  (+ (* x (* x x)) (* x x)))