Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Average Accuracy: 78.6% → 99.1%

Time: 18.7s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 27396

Math

\[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

↓

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - t_0}{e^{wj} + t_0} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - {wj}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

↓

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (+ wj (/ (- x t_0) (+ (exp wj) t_0))) 5e-14)
     (- (+ (* wj wj) (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x)))) (pow wj 3.0))
     (+ wj (/ (- (/ x (exp wj)) wj) (+ wj 1.0))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))));
}

↓

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5e-14) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - pow(wj, 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))))
end function

↓

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5d-14) then
        tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x)))) - (wj ** 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - (((wj * Math.exp(wj)) - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj))));
}

↓

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5e-14) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - Math.pow(wj, 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = wj + (((x / Math.exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return wj - (((wj * math.exp(wj)) - x) / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj))))

↓

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	tmp = 0
	if (wj + ((x - t_0) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5e-14:
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - math.pow(wj, 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = wj + (((x / math.exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(Float64(wj * exp(wj)) - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj)))))
end

↓

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(x - t_0) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5e-14)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(wj * wj) + Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))) - (wj ^ 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(Float64(x / exp(wj)) - wj) / Float64(wj + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))));
end

↓

function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((wj + ((x - t_0) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 5e-14)
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj ^ 3.0);
	else
		tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj + N[(N[(x - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-14], N[(N[(N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[wj, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj + N[(N[(N[(x / N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - wj), $MachinePrecision] / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Target

Original	78.6%
Target	79.4%
Herbie	99.1%

\[wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 5.0000000000000002e-14

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

   2. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Proof

      [Start] 71.5	\[ wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      sub-neg [=>] 71.5	\[ \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      neg-mul-1 [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      *-commutative [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot -1} \]
      *-commutative [<=] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      neg-mul-1 [<=] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      neg-sub0 [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      div-sub [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
      associate--r- [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      +-commutative [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]
      sub0-neg [=>] 71.5	\[ wj + \left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
      sub-neg [<=] 71.5	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{{wj}^{2}} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
      Proof

      [Start] 98.9	\[ -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left({wj}^{2} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
      unpow2 [=>] 98.9	\[ -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{{wj}^{3}} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   if 5.0000000000000002e-14 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

   2. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Proof

      [Start] 96.4	\[ wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      sub-neg [=>] 96.4	\[ \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      neg-mul-1 [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      *-commutative [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \cdot -1} \]
      *-commutative [<=] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      neg-mul-1 [<=] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      neg-sub0 [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      div-sub [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
      associate--r- [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      +-commutative [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(0 - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]
      sub0-neg [=>] 96.4	\[ wj + \left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
      sub-neg [<=] 96.4	\[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - {wj}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	97.3%
Cost	7364

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \left(\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj\right) \cdot \frac{1}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	97.3%
Cost	7236

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	97.7%
Cost	836

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.00115:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	84.1%
Cost	580

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 4.35 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	85.7%
Cost	580

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	83.9%
Cost	456

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-228}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	4.4%
Cost	64

\[wj \]

Alternative 8
Accuracy	84.4%
Cost	64

\[x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023126 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))