Destination given bearing on a great circle

Average Accuracy: 99.7% → 99.8%

Time: 29.0s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 71680

Math

\[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\left(\sin theta \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos \phi_1}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)} \]

↓

\[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 phi1 phi2 delta theta)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (* (sin theta) (sin delta)) (cos phi1))
   (-
    (cos delta)
    (*
     (sin phi1)
     (sin
      (asin
       (+
        (* (sin phi1) (cos delta))
        (* (* (cos phi1) (sin delta)) (cos theta))))))))))

↓

(FPCore (lambda1 phi1 phi2 delta theta)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (sin theta) (* (sin delta) (cos phi1)))
   (-
    (cos delta)
    (*
     (sin phi1)
     (+
      (* (cos delta) (sin phi1))
      (* (cos phi1) (* (sin delta) (cos theta)))))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double phi1, double phi2, double delta, double theta) {
	return lambda1 + atan2(((sin(theta) * sin(delta)) * cos(phi1)), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * sin(asin(((sin(phi1) * cos(delta)) + ((cos(phi1) * sin(delta)) * cos(theta))))))));
}

↓

double code(double lambda1, double phi1, double phi2, double delta, double theta) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((sin(theta) * (sin(delta) * cos(phi1))), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * ((cos(delta) * sin(phi1)) + (cos(phi1) * (sin(delta) * cos(theta)))))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8), intent (in) :: delta
    real(8), intent (in) :: theta
    code = lambda1 + atan2(((sin(theta) * sin(delta)) * cos(phi1)), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * sin(asin(((sin(phi1) * cos(delta)) + ((cos(phi1) * sin(delta)) * cos(theta))))))))
end function

↓

real(8) function code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8), intent (in) :: delta
    real(8), intent (in) :: theta
    code = lambda1 + atan2((sin(theta) * (sin(delta) * cos(phi1))), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * ((cos(delta) * sin(phi1)) + (cos(phi1) * (sin(delta) * cos(theta)))))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double phi1, double phi2, double delta, double theta) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2(((Math.sin(theta) * Math.sin(delta)) * Math.cos(phi1)), (Math.cos(delta) - (Math.sin(phi1) * Math.sin(Math.asin(((Math.sin(phi1) * Math.cos(delta)) + ((Math.cos(phi1) * Math.sin(delta)) * Math.cos(theta))))))));
}

↓

public static double code(double lambda1, double phi1, double phi2, double delta, double theta) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.sin(theta) * (Math.sin(delta) * Math.cos(phi1))), (Math.cos(delta) - (Math.sin(phi1) * ((Math.cos(delta) * Math.sin(phi1)) + (Math.cos(phi1) * (Math.sin(delta) * Math.cos(theta)))))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2(((math.sin(theta) * math.sin(delta)) * math.cos(phi1)), (math.cos(delta) - (math.sin(phi1) * math.sin(math.asin(((math.sin(phi1) * math.cos(delta)) + ((math.cos(phi1) * math.sin(delta)) * math.cos(theta))))))))

↓

def code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.sin(theta) * (math.sin(delta) * math.cos(phi1))), (math.cos(delta) - (math.sin(phi1) * ((math.cos(delta) * math.sin(phi1)) + (math.cos(phi1) * (math.sin(delta) * math.cos(theta)))))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(Float64(sin(theta) * sin(delta)) * cos(phi1)), Float64(cos(delta) - Float64(sin(phi1) * sin(asin(Float64(Float64(sin(phi1) * cos(delta)) + Float64(Float64(cos(phi1) * sin(delta)) * cos(theta)))))))))
end

↓

function code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(sin(theta) * Float64(sin(delta) * cos(phi1))), Float64(cos(delta) - Float64(sin(phi1) * Float64(Float64(cos(delta) * sin(phi1)) + Float64(cos(phi1) * Float64(sin(delta) * cos(theta))))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2(((sin(theta) * sin(delta)) * cos(phi1)), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * sin(asin(((sin(phi1) * cos(delta)) + ((cos(phi1) * sin(delta)) * cos(theta))))))));
end

↓

function tmp = code(lambda1, phi1, phi2, delta, theta)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((sin(theta) * (sin(delta) * cos(phi1))), (cos(delta) - (sin(phi1) * ((cos(delta) * sin(phi1)) + (cos(phi1) * (sin(delta) * cos(theta)))))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, phi1_, phi2_, delta_, theta_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[(N[Sin[theta], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[delta], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[delta], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[ArcSin[N[(N[(N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[delta], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[delta], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[theta], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[lambda1_, phi1_, phi2_, delta_, theta_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Sin[theta], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Sin[delta], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[delta], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Cos[delta], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Sin[delta], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[theta], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\left(\sin theta \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos \phi_1}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)} \]

2. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \sin \sin^{-1} \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin \phi_1, \cos delta, \cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)\right)}} \]
   Proof

   [Start] 99.7	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\left(\sin theta \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos \phi_1}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)} \]
   associate-*l* [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)} \]
   *-commutative [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \color{blue}{\sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1}} \]
   cancel-sign-sub-inv [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos delta + \left(-\sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1}} \]
   cancel-sign-sub [<=] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos delta - \left(-\left(-\sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1}} \]
   *-commutative [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \color{blue}{\sin \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(-\sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)\right)}} \]
   remove-double-neg [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\sin \sin^{-1} \left(\sin \phi_1 \cdot \cos delta + \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \sin delta\right) \cdot \cos theta\right)}} \]

3. Taylor expanded in delta around inf 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \sin delta \cdot \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right)\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1}} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin delta \cdot \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]

5. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\cos theta \cdot \sin delta\right)}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]
   Proof

   [Start] 99.7	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin delta \cdot \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]
   expm1-def [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sin delta \cdot \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]
   expm1-log1p [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\sin delta \cdot \left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right)}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]
   *-commutative [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \phi_1 \cdot \cos theta\right) \cdot \sin delta}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]
   associate-*l* [=>] 99.8	\[ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\cos theta \cdot \sin delta\right)}\right) \cdot \sin \phi_1} \]

6. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \left(\cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1 + \cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos theta\right)\right)} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	94.4%
Cost	65152

\[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - \sin \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin delta \cdot \cos \phi_1 + \cos delta \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	91.6%
Cost	45576

\[\begin{array}{l} t_1 := \sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -0.00096:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_1}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;delta \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot delta\right)}{\sqrt{{\cos \phi_1}^{4}}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(t_1\right)\right)}{\cos delta}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	91.9%
Cost	45504

\[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta - {\sin \phi_1}^{2}} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	91.6%
Cost	39241

\[\begin{array}{l} t_1 := \sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -0.00096 \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_1}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_1}{{\cos \phi_1}^{2}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	91.6%
Cost	39241

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -0.00135 \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot delta\right)}{\sqrt{{\cos \phi_1}^{4}}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	91.5%
Cost	32777

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -0.12 \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin delta \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot \cos \phi_1\right)}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot delta\right)}{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 + \phi_1\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	89.7%
Cost	26761

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -0.095 \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \sin delta}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_1 \cdot \left(\sin theta \cdot delta\right)}{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 + \phi_1\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8
Accuracy	86.2%
Cost	25984

\[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot \sin delta}{\cos delta} \]

Alternative 9
Accuracy	76.3%
Cost	19849

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-44} \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-107}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{theta \cdot \sin delta}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10
Accuracy	80.7%
Cost	19849

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;delta \leq -5500 \lor \neg \left(delta \leq 0.0078\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{theta \cdot \sin delta}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin theta \cdot delta}{\cos delta}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11
Accuracy	69.6%
Cost	13448

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;theta \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;theta \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{theta \cdot delta}{\cos delta}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12
Accuracy	69.9%
Cost	64

\[\lambda_1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023122 
(FPCore (lambda1 phi1 phi2 delta theta)
  :name "Destination given bearing on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (+ lambda1 (atan2 (* (* (sin theta) (sin delta)) (cos phi1)) (- (cos delta) (* (sin phi1) (sin (asin (+ (* (sin phi1) (cos delta)) (* (* (cos phi1) (sin delta)) (cos theta))))))))))