| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 53.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 984.00 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;d \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-216}:\\
\;\;\;\;c \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-199}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-183}:\\
\;\;\;\;c \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\
\;\;\;\;c \cdot a\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot d\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 83.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 982.00 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-151} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-139}\right) \land \left(b \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-121} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-92}\right) \land b \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(c + d\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(b + c\right) \cdot a\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 85.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 981.00 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := a \cdot \left(b + d\right)\\
t_1 := \left(b + c\right) \cdot a\\
\mathbf{if}\;d \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-154}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;d \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-87} \lor \neg \left(d \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-61}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(c + d\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 78.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 452.00 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;d \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(b + c\right) \cdot a\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot d\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 99.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 448.00 |
|---|
\[a \cdot \left(\left(b + c\right) + d\right)
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 53.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 324.00 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;c \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-133}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;c \cdot a\\
\end{array}
\]