?

Average Error: 100.0% → 99.9%
Time: 8.2s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 19776.00

?

\[e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \]
\[{\left({\left(e^{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot x}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (exp (- (- 1.0 (* x x)))))
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (pow (pow (exp (+ 0.5 (* 0.5 x))) (+ x -1.0)) 2.0))
double code(double x) {
	return exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}
double code(double x) {
	return pow(pow(exp((0.5 + (0.5 * x))), (x + -1.0)), 2.0);
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = exp(-(1.0d0 - (x * x)))
end function
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (exp((0.5d0 + (0.5d0 * x))) ** (x + (-1.0d0))) ** 2.0d0
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}
public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.pow(Math.pow(Math.exp((0.5 + (0.5 * x))), (x + -1.0)), 2.0);
}
def code(x):
	return math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)))
def code(x):
	return math.pow(math.pow(math.exp((0.5 + (0.5 * x))), (x + -1.0)), 2.0)
function code(x)
	return exp(Float64(-Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x))))
end
function code(x)
	return (exp(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * x))) ^ Float64(x + -1.0)) ^ 2.0
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (exp((0.5 + (0.5 * x))) ^ (x + -1.0)) ^ 2.0;
end
code[x_] := N[Exp[(-N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_] := N[Power[N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]
e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)}
{\left({\left(e^{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot x}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)}\right)}^{2}

Error?

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 100.0

    \[e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \]
  2. Simplified100.0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot x + -1}} \]
    Proof

    [Start]100.0

    \[ e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \]

    neg-sub0 [=>]100.0

    \[ e^{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - x \cdot x\right)}} \]

    associate--r- [=>]100.0

    \[ e^{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + x \cdot x}} \]

    metadata-eval [=>]100.0

    \[ e^{\color{blue}{-1} + x \cdot x} \]

    +-commutative [=>]100.0

    \[ e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot x + -1}} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr100.0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(e^{x + 1}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)}} \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.9

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{e^{x + 1}}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{e^{x + 1}}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\sqrt{e^{1 + x}}\right)}^{\left(x - 1\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr99.9

    \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.5 + x \cdot 0.5}\right)}}^{\left(x - 1\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
  7. Final simplification99.9

    \[\leadsto {\left({\left(e^{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot x}\right)}^{\left(x + -1\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Error100.0%
Cost6720.00
\[e^{x \cdot x + -1} \]
Alternative 2
Error98.7%
Cost6464.00
\[e^{-1} \]

Error

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023093 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "exp neg sub"
  :precision binary64
  (exp (- (- 1.0 (* x x)))))