?

Average Error: 93.51% → 0.13%
Time: 16.2s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 576

?

\[-0.026 < x \land x < 0.026\]
\[\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{\tan x} \]
\[\frac{x}{3 + -0.2 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- (/ 1.0 x) (/ 1.0 (tan x))))
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ x (+ 3.0 (* -0.2 (* x x)))))
double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / x) - (1.0 / tan(x));
}
double code(double x) {
	return x / (3.0 + (-0.2 * (x * x)));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (1.0d0 / x) - (1.0d0 / tan(x))
end function
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x / (3.0d0 + ((-0.2d0) * (x * x)))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / x) - (1.0 / Math.tan(x));
}
public static double code(double x) {
	return x / (3.0 + (-0.2 * (x * x)));
}
def code(x):
	return (1.0 / x) - (1.0 / math.tan(x))
def code(x):
	return x / (3.0 + (-0.2 * (x * x)))
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / x) - Float64(1.0 / tan(x)))
end
function code(x)
	return Float64(x / Float64(3.0 + Float64(-0.2 * Float64(x * x))))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (1.0 / x) - (1.0 / tan(x));
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = x / (3.0 + (-0.2 * (x * x)));
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(1.0 / N[Tan[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
code[x_] := N[(x / N[(3.0 + N[(-0.2 * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{\tan x}
\frac{x}{3 + -0.2 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)}

Error?

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Target

Original93.51%
Target0.15%
Herbie0.13%
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left|x\right| < 0.026:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{3} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x \cdot x}{15}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{\tan x}\\ \end{array} \]

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 93.51

    \[\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{\tan x} \]
  2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0.67

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333 \cdot x + 0.022222222222222223 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr0.67

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.022222222222222223 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + 0.3333333333333333\right)} \]
  4. Applied egg-rr0.15

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.022222222222222223, x \cdot x, 0.3333333333333333\right)}}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0.13

    \[\leadsto \frac{x}{\color{blue}{3 + -0.2 \cdot {x}^{2}}} \]
  6. Simplified0.13

    \[\leadsto \frac{x}{\color{blue}{3 + -0.2 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)}} \]
    Proof

    [Start]0.13

    \[ \frac{x}{3 + -0.2 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]

    unpow2 [=>]0.13

    \[ \frac{x}{3 + -0.2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)}} \]
  7. Final simplification0.13

    \[\leadsto \frac{x}{3 + -0.2 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Error0.67%
Cost576
\[x \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.022222222222222223 + 0.3333333333333333\right) \]
Alternative 2
Error0.56%
Cost576
\[\frac{1}{\frac{3}{x} + x \cdot -0.2} \]
Alternative 3
Error1.15%
Cost192
\[x \cdot 0.3333333333333333 \]
Alternative 4
Error0.63%
Cost192
\[\frac{x}{3} \]

Error

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023088 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "invcot (example 3.9)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< -0.026 x) (< x 0.026))

  :herbie-target
  (if (< (fabs x) 0.026) (* (/ x 3.0) (+ 1.0 (/ (* x x) 15.0))) (- (/ 1.0 x) (/ 1.0 (tan x))))

  (- (/ 1.0 x) (/ 1.0 (tan x))))