Numeric.SpecFunctions:choose from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Average Error: 12.1 → 2.1

Time: 7.5s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 8268

Math

\[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]

↓

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + z\right) \cdot \frac{x}{z}\\ \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (* x (+ y z)) z))

↓

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (* x (+ y z)) z)))
   (if (<= t_0 -1e+301)
     (* x (+ 1.0 (/ y z)))
     (if (<= t_0 -2e-25)
       (+ x (/ (* x y) z))
       (if (<= t_0 4e+64) (fma x (/ y z) x) (* (+ y z) (/ x z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) / z;
}

↓

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x * (y + z)) / z;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -1e+301) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (y / z));
	} else if (t_0 <= -2e-25) {
		tmp = x + ((x * y) / z);
	} else if (t_0 <= 4e+64) {
		tmp = fma(x, (y / z), x);
	} else {
		tmp = (y + z) * (x / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) / z)
end

↓

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) / z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -1e+301)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(y / z)));
	elseif (t_0 <= -2e-25)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(x * y) / z));
	elseif (t_0 <= 4e+64)
		tmp = fma(x, Float64(y / z), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + z) * Float64(x / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e+301], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -2e-25], N[(x + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4e+64], N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Target

Original	12.1
Target	3.2
Herbie	2.1

\[\frac{x}{\frac{z}{y + z}} \]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z) < -1.00000000000000005e301

   1. Initial program 60.7

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]

   2. Simplified 0.9

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x\right)} \]
      Proof
      (fma.f64 x (/.f64 y z) x): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite<= fma-def_binary64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x (/.f64 y z)) x)): 3 points increase in error, 1 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (Rewrite=> associate-*r/_binary64 (/.f64 (*.f64 x y) z)) x): 31 points increase in error, 23 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (Rewrite<= associate-*l/_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y)) x): 37 points increase in error, 32 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (Rewrite<= /-rgt-identity_binary64 (/.f64 x 1))): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (/.f64 x (Rewrite<= *-inverses_binary64 (/.f64 z z)))): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (Rewrite=> associate-/r/_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) z))): 57 points increase in error, 3 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite<= distribute-lft-in_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) (+.f64 y z))): 2 points increase in error, 2 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite=> associate-*l/_binary64 (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z)): 67 points increase in error, 83 points decrease in error

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0.9

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e301 < (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z) < -2.00000000000000008e-25

   1. Initial program 0.2

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 0.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot x}{z} + x} \]

   if -2.00000000000000008e-25 < (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z) < 4.00000000000000009e64

   1. Initial program 6.0

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]

   2. Simplified 0.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x\right)} \]
      Proof
      (fma.f64 x (/.f64 y z) x): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite<= fma-def_binary64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x (/.f64 y z)) x)): 3 points increase in error, 1 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (Rewrite=> associate-*r/_binary64 (/.f64 (*.f64 x y) z)) x): 31 points increase in error, 23 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (Rewrite<= associate-*l/_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y)) x): 37 points increase in error, 32 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (Rewrite<= /-rgt-identity_binary64 (/.f64 x 1))): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (/.f64 x (Rewrite<= *-inverses_binary64 (/.f64 z z)))): 0 points increase in error, 0 points decrease in error
      (+.f64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) y) (Rewrite=> associate-/r/_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) z))): 57 points increase in error, 3 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite<= distribute-lft-in_binary64 (*.f64 (/.f64 x z) (+.f64 y z))): 2 points increase in error, 2 points decrease in error
      (Rewrite=> associate-*l/_binary64 (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z)): 67 points increase in error, 83 points decrease in error

   if 4.00000000000000009e64 < (/.f64 (*.f64 x (+.f64 y z)) z)

   1. Initial program 19.7

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]

   2. Applied egg-rr 7.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{z} \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 2.1

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + z\right) \cdot \frac{x}{z}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Error	2.1
Cost	1996

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z}\\ t_1 := x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + z\right) \cdot \frac{x}{z}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Error	20.7
Cost	848

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x}{\frac{z}{y}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 12585843413552300:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Error	19.7
Cost	848

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y}{\frac{z}{x}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 12585843413552300:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{\frac{z}{y}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Error	19.6
Cost	848

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \frac{x}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 12585843413552300:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{\frac{z}{y}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Error	21.0
Cost	848

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+224}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 12585843413552300:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{\frac{z}{y}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Error	4.6
Cost	712

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.63124111330247 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + z\right) \cdot \frac{x}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Error	4.5
Cost	448

\[x + \frac{x \cdot y}{z} \]

Alternative 8
Error	24.9
Cost	64

\[x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2022301 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:choose from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (/ x (/ z (+ y z)))

  (/ (* x (+ y z)) z))