Average Error: 0.0 → 0.0
Time: 5.2s
Precision: 64
\[0.707110000000000016 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061000000000002}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.992290000000000005 + x \cdot 0.044810000000000003\right)} - x\right)\]
↓
\[\mathsf{fma}\left(-x, 0.707110000000000016, \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.707110000000000016 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061000000000002, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.044810000000000003, x, 0.992290000000000005\right), 1\right)}\right)\right)\right)\]
0.707110000000000016 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061000000000002}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.992290000000000005 + x \cdot 0.044810000000000003\right)} - x\right)
↓
\mathsf{fma}\left(-x, 0.707110000000000016, \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.707110000000000016 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061000000000002, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.044810000000000003, x, 0.992290000000000005\right), 1\right)}\right)\right)\right)
double code(double x) {
	return ((double) (0.70711 * ((double) (((double) (((double) (2.30753 + ((double) (x * 0.27061)))) / ((double) (1.0 + ((double) (x * ((double) (0.99229 + ((double) (x * 0.04481)))))))))) - x))));
}
↓
double code(double x) {
	return ((double) fma(((double) -(x)), 0.70711, ((double) expm1(((double) log1p(((double) (((double) (0.70711 * ((double) fma(0.27061, x, 2.30753)))) / ((double) fma(x, ((double) fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229)), 1.0))))))))));
}

Error

Bits error versus x

Try it out

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation

  1. Initial program 0.0

    \[0.707110000000000016 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061000000000002}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.992290000000000005 + x \cdot 0.044810000000000003\right)} - x\right)\]

  2. Simplified0.0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-x, 0.707110000000000016, \frac{0.707110000000000016 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061000000000002, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.044810000000000003, x, 0.992290000000000005\right), 1\right)}\right)}\]
  3. Using strategy rm

  4. Applied expm1-log1p-u0.0

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, 0.707110000000000016, \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.707110000000000016 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061000000000002, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.044810000000000003, x, 0.992290000000000005\right), 1\right)}\right)\right)}\right)\]

  5. Final simplification0.0

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, 0.707110000000000016, \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.707110000000000016 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061000000000002, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.044810000000000003, x, 0.992290000000000005\right), 1\right)}\right)\right)\right)\]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2020113 +o rules:numerics
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))