Average Error: 0.0 → 0.0

Time: 403.0ms

Precision: 64

\[0.0 \le x \le 2\]

\[x + x \cdot x\]

↓

\[x + x \cdot x\]

x + x \cdot x

↓

x + x \cdot x

double f(double x) {
        double r89397 = x;
        double r89398 = r89397 * r89397;
        double r89399 = r89397 + r89398;
        return r89399;
}

↓

double f(double x) {
        double r89400 = x;
        double r89401 = r89400 * r89400;
        double r89402 = r89400 + r89401;
        return r89402;
}

Error

The X axis uses an exponential scale — Bits error versus `x`

Try it out

In
Out

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Target

Original	0.0
Target	0.0
Herbie	0.0

\[\left(1 + x\right) \cdot x\]

Derivation

Initial program 0.0
\[x + x \cdot x\]
Final simplification0.0
\[\leadsto x + x \cdot x\]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2020057 +o rules:numerics
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Expression 2, p15"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (<= 0.0 x 2)

  :herbie-target
  (* (+ 1 x) x)

  (+ x (* x x)))