Average Error: 32.0 → 0
Time: 1.1s
Precision: 64
\[\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)\]
\[\log \left(1 \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)\]
\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)
\log \left(1 \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)
double f(double re, double im) {
        double r30776 = re;
        double r30777 = r30776 * r30776;
        double r30778 = im;
        double r30779 = r30778 * r30778;
        double r30780 = r30777 + r30779;
        double r30781 = sqrt(r30780);
        double r30782 = log(r30781);
        return r30782;
}

double f(double re, double im) {
        double r30783 = 1.0;
        double r30784 = re;
        double r30785 = im;
        double r30786 = hypot(r30784, r30785);
        double r30787 = r30783 * r30786;
        double r30788 = log(r30787);
        return r30788;
}

Error

Bits error versus re

Bits error versus im

Try it out

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation

  1. Initial program 32.0

    \[\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)\]
  2. Using strategy rm
  3. Applied *-un-lft-identity32.0

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(re \cdot re + im \cdot im\right)}}\right)\]
  4. Applied sqrt-prod32.0

    \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{1} \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}\]
  5. Simplified32.0

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{1} \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)\]
  6. Simplified0

    \[\leadsto \log \left(1 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)\]
  7. Final simplification0

    \[\leadsto \log \left(1 \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)\]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2020036 +o rules:numerics
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.log/1 on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))