Average Error: 49.2 → 0
Time: 4.6s
Precision: 64
\[1.9 \le t \le 2.1\]
\[1.7 \cdot 10^{+308} \cdot t - 1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\]
↓
\[\mathsf{fma}\left(1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}, t, -1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\]
1.7 \cdot 10^{+308} \cdot t - 1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}
↓
\mathsf{fma}\left(1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}, t, -1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)
double f(double t) {
        double r2368316 = 1.7e+308;
        double r2368317 = t;
        double r2368318 = r2368316 * r2368317;
        double r2368319 = r2368318 - r2368316;
        return r2368319;
}
↓
double f(double t) {
        double r2368320 = 1.7e+308;
        double r2368321 = t;
        double r2368322 = -r2368320;
        double r2368323 = fma(r2368320, r2368321, r2368322);
        return r2368323;
}

Error

Bits error versus t

Target

Original49.2
Target0
Herbie0
\[\mathsf{fma}\left(1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}, t, -1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\]

Derivation

  1. Initial program 49.2

    \[1.7 \cdot 10^{+308} \cdot t - 1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\]
  2. Using strategy rm

  3. Applied fma-neg0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}, t, -1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)}\]

  4. Final simplification0

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}, t, -1.7 \cdot 10^{+308}\right)\]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2019162 +o rules:numerics
(FPCore (t)
  :name "fma_test2"
  :pre (<= 1.9 t 2.1)

  :herbie-target
  (fma 1.7e+308 t (- 1.7e+308))

  (- (* 1.7e+308 t) 1.7e+308))